https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95505

--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Michael Bruck from comment #6)
> Is it possible to point the user to include <new> here like other parts of
> gcc do for standard library functions?
> i.e. name-lookup.c missing_std_header

That's also a possibility (we do that for a missing <coroutine> include
already).

Reply via email to