https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97272
--- Comment #5 from Bill Long <longb at cray dot com> --- The original intent of adding the KIND argument was because some implementations used a 32-bit integer for the result, and it is possible for the answer to be larger than 2**31-1. Just checking to be sure that the underlying library code returns a 64-bit integer that can later be converted based on the KIND value.
