https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #32 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #31) > (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #30) > > On 10/19/20 6:40 PM, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360 > > > > > > --- Comment #28 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > > > (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #25) > > >> Wonder if it was suppose to be something like: > > >> > > >> > > >> /* Vector pair and vector quad support. */ > > >> if (TARGET_EXTRA_BUILTINS) > > >> { > > >> - tree oi_uns_type = make_unsigned_type (256); > > >> - vector_pair_type_node = build_distinct_type_copy (oi_uns_type); > > >> + vector_pair_type_node = make_unsigned_type (256); > > >> SET_TYPE_MODE (vector_pair_type_node, POImode); > > >> layout_type (vector_pair_type_node); > > >> lang_hooks.types.register_builtin_type (vector_pair_type_node, > > >> "__vector_pair"); > > >> > > >> - tree xi_uns_type = make_unsigned_type (512); > > >> - vector_quad_type_node = build_distinct_type_copy (xi_uns_type); > > >> + vector_quad_type_node = make_unsigned_type (512); > > >> SET_TYPE_MODE (vector_quad_type_node, PXImode); > > >> layout_type (vector_quad_type_node); > > >> lang_hooks.types.register_builtin_type (vector_quad_type_node, > > > So this passed bootstrap and regtesting with no regressions. > > > > > > Is this really the correct fix? > > Yes. Just to verify, this is an approval for Andrew's patch above? If so, I can push it to trunk for Andrew.
