https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360

--- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On October 20, 2020 4:16:37 PM GMT+02:00, "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org"
<gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
>
>--- Comment #32 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #31)
>> (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #30)
>> > On 10/19/20 6:40 PM, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
>> > >
>> > > --- Comment #28 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org>
>---
>> > > (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #25)
>> > >> Wonder if it was suppose to be something like:
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>     /* Vector pair and vector quad support.  */
>> > >>     if (TARGET_EXTRA_BUILTINS)
>> > >>       {
>> > >> -      tree oi_uns_type = make_unsigned_type (256);
>> > >> -      vector_pair_type_node = build_distinct_type_copy
>(oi_uns_type);
>> > >> +      vector_pair_type_node = make_unsigned_type (256);
>> > >>         SET_TYPE_MODE (vector_pair_type_node, POImode);
>> > >>         layout_type (vector_pair_type_node);
>> > >>         lang_hooks.types.register_builtin_type
>(vector_pair_type_node,
>> > >>                                                "__vector_pair");
>> > >>   
>> > >> -      tree xi_uns_type = make_unsigned_type (512);
>> > >> -      vector_quad_type_node = build_distinct_type_copy
>(xi_uns_type);
>> > >> +      vector_quad_type_node = make_unsigned_type (512);
>> > >>         SET_TYPE_MODE (vector_quad_type_node, PXImode);
>> > >>         layout_type (vector_quad_type_node);
>> > >>         lang_hooks.types.register_builtin_type
>(vector_quad_type_node,
>> > > So this passed bootstrap and regtesting with no regressions.
>> > >
>> > > Is this really the correct fix?
>> 
>> Yes.
>
>Just to verify, this is an approval for Andrew's patch above?

Yes. 

>If so, I can push it to trunk for Andrew.

Reply via email to