https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> --- After https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-cvs/2020-November/336787.html the simplified test case seems to be fixed. What I now get with the original test case is Decomposition information on image 4 : there are 2 * 4 slabs; the slab on this image has 45 * 21 grid cells. Decomposition information on image 6 : there are 2 * 4 slabs; the slab on this image has 45 * 23 grid cells. Decomposition information on image 2 : there are 2 * 4 slabs; the slab on this image has 45 * 23 grid cells. Decomposition information on image 8 : there are 2 * 4 slabs; the slab on this image has 45 * 21 grid cells. Decomposition information on image 5 : there are 2 * 4 slabs; the slab on this image has 45 * 23 grid cells. Decomposition information on image 1 : there are 2 * 4 slabs; the slab on this image has 45 * 23 grid cells. Decomposition information on image 7 : there are 2 * 4 slabs; the slab on this image has 45 * 23 grid cells. Decomposition information on image 3 : there are 2 * 4 slabs; the slab on this image has 45 * 23 grid cells. Size mismatch for coarray allocation id 0x608460: found = 30240 != size = 33120 where the error message seems to be correct; I think all coarrays on different images must have the same size. Toon, could you maybe comment?