https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93993
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #5) > > (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #4) > > > The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm > > > <dmalc...@gcc.gnu.org>: > > > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ac3eb5c5f157bea22b5ae34b0df254d729dac25 > > > > > > commit r10-7028-g4ac3eb5c5f157bea22b5ae34b0df254d729dac25 > > > Author: David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> > > > Date: Wed Mar 4 12:10:34 2020 -0500 > > > > > > analyzer: add regression test for fixed ICE [PR94028] > > > > > > The C++ reproducer for PR analyzer/94028 generates a similar ICE > > > to that of the Fortran reproducer for PR analyzer/93993 and, like > > > it, was fixed by r10-7023-g3d66e153b40ed000af30a9e569a05f34d5d576aa. > > > > > > This patch adds the C++ reproducer as a regression test. > > > > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > > PR analyzer/94028 > > > * g++.dg/analyzer/pr94028.C: New test. > > > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/analyzer/pr93993.f90 -O (test for excess errors) > > Excess errors: > > /home/pault/gitsources/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/analyzer/pr93993.f90:21: > > 0: Warning: leak of 'tm' [CWE-401] [-Wanalyzer-malloc-leak] > > > > On current 10-branch. FC31/x86_64 > > > > Paul > > @David: The test-case is still failing. Are you planning to fix it or may I > mark it as xfail? Hi All, It is still failing on 10-branch. Cheers Paul
