https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98597

--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
BTW, I'm not convinced it is ok to use TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE arg)) in the !addr
case for anything at all even for warnings, as in GIMPLE pointer conversions
are useless and therefore it very well could be completely unrelated pointer
type (in the more lucky case say void * from say the memory allocation, but if
less lucky...).

Reply via email to