https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99200
--- Comment #4 from JoaoBapt <jbaptistapsilva at yahoo dot com.br> --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2) > Looks like a dup of 93383. No, because it works perfectly when I substitute __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ for any other string literal, even as big as one that would be "returned" by __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ (I tested with, for example, "consteval const char* type_name<T>() [with T = double]" and it did not crash and worked perfectly).
