https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100513

--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> If you want to avoid that
>   if (lhs && TREE_CODE (lhs) == SSA_NAME)
>     SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (lhs) = gs;
> in gimple_call_set_lhs, I think it deserves a comment and probably
>   *gimple_call_lhs_ptr (new_stmt) = lhs;
> would be cleaner than gimple_set_op (new_stmt, 0, lhs);

Good point.  Note I'm not (yet) testing the patch.

Reply via email to