https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411

--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Vladimir Fuka from comment #7)
> This sounds like good progress and I thank you for the patch. However,
> shouldn't implicitly SAVE'd variables, as e.g. the program local variable in
> the original report, be included as well?

You are right.

However, note that implicit SAVE for the main was added by Tobias only in
r12-805,
so I might have to think about a follow-up to this one.

Reply via email to