https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Vladimir Fuka from comment #7) > This sounds like good progress and I thank you for the patch. However, > shouldn't implicitly SAVE'd variables, as e.g. the program local variable in > the original report, be included as well? You are right. However, note that implicit SAVE for the main was added by Tobias only in r12-805, so I might have to think about a follow-up to this one.