https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93734
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux at gmail dot com> --- I can't reproduce the wrong code using either the fortran test case in #c2 or the C one in #c3 with gcc-9.4.0 on Kaby Lake R. If I revert the PR92420 fix both test cases do reproduce the wrong code. Thus I think this was fixed by PR92420 in gcc-8.4.0 and gcc-9.3.0.