https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101980
--- Comment #5 from Ankur Saini <arsenic at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #4) > (In reply to Ankur Saini from comment #3) > > Fixed after the following commits: > > e92d0ff6b5e6d4b95c04fc3e326d40efeb136086 > > 537878152ded8b7d271333b803b36c27a9aea8d2 > > g++.dg/analyzer/pr96641.C, a regression introduced by this commit (or > unlikely, another commit in the series 640df4ef815a..f0fca213bc52), remains > to be fixed. > It seems to fail everywhere: > > s390x-ibm-linux-gnu > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-August/716425.html > > x86_64-pc-linux-gnu 3c496e92d795a8fe5c527e3c5b5a6606669ae50d > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-August/716406.html > > powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu 6d692ef43b2b3368c92c3fb757c7884fc94ee627 > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-August/716400.html > > powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu 3c496e92d795a8fe5c527e3c5b5a6606669ae50d > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-August/716428.html > > i686-pc-linux-gnu 6e5401e87d02919b0594e04f828892deef956407 > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-August/716332.html > > powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.3.0 0312e263b6afa5b545c2d3b7c7ac5295ecaa7fa8 > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-August/716308.html > > m68k-unknown-linux-gnu 192d4edd15c > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021-August/716297.html > > For cris-elf, I see this in g++.log: > /X/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/analyzer/pr96641.C:8:3: warning: analysis bailed out > early (91 'after-snode' enodes; 228 enodes) [-Wanalyzer-too-complex] Thanks for pointing this out. This is due to the fact that analyzer doesn't have a maximum recursion limit when analysing dynamically discovered calls ( vfunc calls or calls that happen via a function pointer ). I have sent a patch on the patches list which should fix this problem. - - - Patch : https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/578091.html
