https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102401
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes this is the way the C++ standard is defined. Even clang rejects it. I
would have thought __builtin_clear_padding could be used in constexpr but I was
wrong.
