https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52274

Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|52279                       |38573, 52232, 52234, 52245,
                   |                            |52246, 52262, 52273
             Blocks|38573, 52232, 52234, 52245, |
                   |52246, 52262, 52273         |
                 CC|                            |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #2)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> > Are the "Depends on" and "Blocks" fields swapped here? Normally meta-bugs
> > depend on more bugs than they block
> 
> Looks a bit confused, please rearrange if you think this is worth it.

Ok.

> 
> Also, I am also not sure how this is different from 52279.
> 
> Close either this or 52279 as duplicate?

I'll close 52279 as a duplicate of this, just to keep things in chronological
order.


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38573
[Bug 38573] Missing markers for translation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52232
[Bug 52232] translatable string typos: "conindexed" (should be "coindexed")
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52234
[Bug 52234] translatable string typo: "argument argument"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52245
[Bug 52245] translatable string: "Fortran F2003"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52246
[Bug 52246] translatable string typo: plural use ("one translatable objects")
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52262
[Bug 52262] translatable string typos (3): "REAl"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52273
[Bug 52273] translatable string typo: "at at %L"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52279
[Bug 52279] Fortran translation issues
  • [Bug fortran/52274] [Meta-bug] F... egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

Reply via email to