https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #39 from cqwrteur <unlvsur at live dot com> --- (In reply to Andrew Aladjev from comment #38) > Sure, patches works perfect. But we need somehow decrease the chance of > similar regressions in future. It is possible by adding any basic "canadian" > build into the list of tests to be done before release. We should not try to > add such test into codebase itself, we need just to intrigue any of core gcc > developers to add this test into the virtual checklist. > > Thank you. You do not need to worry tbh, people like me would test before you. They have much more issues than just a Canadian build tbh. Like copying wrong DLLs for multilibs. Nobody ever built that before probably.
