https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #40 from cqwrteur <unlvsur at live dot com> --- (In reply to Andrew Aladjev from comment #38) > Sure, patches works perfect. But we need somehow decrease the chance of > similar regressions in future. It is possible by adding any basic "canadian" > build into the list of tests to be done before release. We should not try to > add such test into codebase itself, we need just to intrigue any of core gcc > developers to add this test into the virtual checklist. > > Thank you. Issues like this are exactly why i would never use a script (including things like cross-ng) to build anything. I would build everything manually since it is very likely to fail for all sorts of different reasons, neither their testing would fix it since they have to include different libcs (we have hundreds of different libcs) to test each of them, which is not possible.
