https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104223
Bug ID: 104223 Summary: GCC unable to inline trivial functions passed to views::filter and transform unless lifted into types Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: redbeard0531 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I'm not sure if this is an issue with the optimizer or the way that the library code is written, or some combination of the two, but the end result seems unfortunate. with() and without() are logically the same function, the only difference is that with() lifts the function pointers into types using a templated lambda variable, while without() just passes the function names directly to the library. It seems interesting that the optimizer knows that they are "constant enough" to emit direct rather than indirect calls to t() and f(), however, it isn't constant enough to inline those calls. https://godbolt.org/z/EqWzzh916 Flags: -std=c++2b -O3 Reproduces on at least 11.2 and trunk #include <ranges> namespace views = std::views; void trace() noexcept; inline int f(int i) { trace(); return i; } inline bool t(int) { return true; } // for some reason gcc needs this in order to inline f() and t() template <auto f> auto typify = [] (int i) { return f(i); }; void with() { for (auto&& x : views::single(1) | views::transform(typify<f>) | views::filter(typify<t>)) {} } void without() { for (auto&& x : views::single(1) | views::transform(f) | views::filter(t)) {} } with(): sub rsp, 8 call trace() add rsp, 8 jmp trace() without(): sub rsp, 8 mov edi, 1 call f(int) mov edi, eax call t(int) test al, al jne .L10 add rsp, 8 ret .L10: mov edi, 1 add rsp, 8 jmp f(int)