https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94566
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
That one isn't portable, relies on both the strong_ordering underlying
implementation using an 8-bit integer member rather than something else, and
also hardcodes the exact values where in C++ the -1 / 0 / 1 are exposition only
and unordered value is -127 rather than what gcc uses (2).
By writing a series of ifs or switch one achieves portability and we'd just
like to get efficient code if the values the user chose match those used by the
implementation.
