https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107795
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Louis Dionne from comment #4) > Yeah but we may need to add stuff to <limits.h> on some platforms, so we may > need to have such a header. Also, I assume you only do that for a subset of > headers, because you must have <foo.h> headers in libstdc++ for a few > headers that require adding const-correct overloads of e.g. `memchr`? See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30928 and https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33935 for those issues there.
