https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107795
--- Comment #11 from Louis Dionne <ldionne.2 at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
>
> GCC version specific includes > GCC version specific fixincludes > C library
> includes
>
> That is for C.
> C++ is:
> libstdc++ library includes > ... (rest same as C).
Okay, that's great. That's exactly what I want! I want to be able to do:
libc++ library includes > ... (rest same as C)
What I'm trying to say is precisely that this doesn't work as intended today,
because somewhere inside "rest same as C", a header is taking for granted that
libstdc++ does NOT implement a <limits.h> header. If it did, then libstdc++
would get the same issue that we are having.
Is there a reason why GCC needs to indirect through <syslimits.h> and
recursively include <limits.h>, telling it to recurse using _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H?
