https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81649
--- Comment #2 from Jonny Grant <jg at jguk dot org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > That doesn't look correct to me, as it is the option that ensures that the > executables are linked against such a library, after all, it is the only > purpose of the option. Maybe we should just replace the " and t" with ". T". That sounds good. I made a patch with your change and will email to gcc-patches. If you could review please.
