https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109843

            Bug ID: 109843
           Summary: signbit comparisons -> copysign optimization
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

float copysign1(float  x, float y)
{
        bool t = __builtin_signbit(x) == 0;
        bool t1 = __builtin_signbit(y) == 0;
        return (t == t1) ? y : -y;
}
float copysign2(float  x, float y)
{
        bool t = __builtin_signbit(x) != 0;
        bool t1 = __builtin_signbit(y) != 0;
        return (t == t1) ? y : -y;
}
float copysign3(float  x, float y)
{
        bool t = __builtin_signbit(x) != 0;
        bool t1 = __builtin_signbit(y) == 0;
        return (t != t1) ? y : -y;
}
float copysign4(float  x, float y)
{
        bool t = __builtin_signbit(x) == 0;
        bool t1 = __builtin_signbit(y) != 0;
        return (t != t1) ? y : -y;
}
float copysign5(float  x, float y)
{
        return __builtin_copysignf(x, y);
}

These all should end up being the same code.
Hopefully I didn't mess these up.

Reply via email to