https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88688
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
nagfor has the same behavior as ifort.
I believe that the following, which appears in F2018:19.5.1.6 applies:
"If a selector has the POINTER attribute, it shall be associated; the associate
name is associated with the target of the pointer and does not have the POINTER
attribute."
In other words, the association shall be via assignment, rather than pointer
assignment.
Changing to new.
Paul
PS Thomas, did you by any chance take this up on c.l.f?
