https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106081
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Wed, 26 Jul 2023, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106081 > > --- Comment #14 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot > gnu.org> --- > FWIW, changing: > > if (!STMT_VINFO_GROUPED_ACCESS (dr_stmt)) > continue; > > to: > > if (!STMT_VINFO_GROUPED_ACCESS (dr_stmt)) > { > partition.layout = -1; > continue; > } > > in start_choosing_layouts fixes it for me. We can then choose layout 1 for > the > splat. > > I think these conditions were carried over from the old code. Without > checking > further, I'm not 100% sure what effect relaxing them would have :) I've added the above condition when introducing the support for splats recently. The above change indeed works - I'm going to give it further testing.
