https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112733
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The #c11 patch regresses gcc.dg/bitint-3{8,9}.c tests (and apparently it is just the 1st and/or 6th hunk where I've tried to make the XALLOCAVEC allocations smaller; the rest of the changes seem to work ok.