https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111591
--- Comment #36 from Mathieu Malaterre <malat at debian dot org> --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #32) [...] > So IMHO #c1 test case is problematic, hi @Mathieu, could you have a double > check? I vaguely recall crafting this test-case with cvise with gcc-13. This is why it is using some kind of gcc-13 specific `__remove_reference`. I cannot verify the code using clang because of this. I also do not see anything wrong under valgrind. If the other test-case(s) (also cvise-reduced) is/are now working I would say let's close this one as fixed and if it re-appear in the original highway source code, I'll re-run yet another cvise reduction. Thanks everyone for your work ! Very much appreciated.
