https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113210

--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> That is, another fix might be to adjust NITERSM1 to NITERS - 1 when
> NITERS went constant ...  (btw, I want to get rid of _NITERS and only

Or we could only use fold_build2 for the PLUS_EXPR 1 computation if NITERSM1 is
INTEGER_CST, otherwise use build2...

Reply via email to