[Bug tree-optimization/113210] [14 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have cond_expr in get_len, at tree.h:6481

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113210

--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> > That is, another fix might be to adjust NITERSM1 to NITERS - 1 when
> > NITERS went constant ...  (btw, I want to get rid of _NITERS and only
> 
> Or we could only use fold_build2 for the PLUS_EXPR 1 computation if NITERSM1
> is INTEGER_CST, otherwise use build2...

I think we should see where the original expression is built but not folded.