https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113402
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2024-01-15 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 57087 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57087&action=edit gcc14-pr113402.patch Untested fix. Though, I wonder if we also shouldn't rename those symbols, having __builtin_ prefix in the names is highly undesirable. Weren't we contemplating disabling support of defining or even declaring __builtin_* functions/variables altogether several times?