https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113403
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #12) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11) > > Or put it in libgcc_eh.a and libgcc_s.so.1? > > Yes, that's what I came up with as well (conceptually, not a patch, and I > only have a background in ELF), but Iain already dismissed it in comment 3. I would not do that for Darwin, experience with emuTLS gave us headaches in doing that, especially since our users are often building projects using both GCC and clang. However, this is an area where individual targets can have different solutions - so my comment should not be seen to apply to ELF targets if that seems the best remedy there.
