https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113575
Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, this is a known issue and it's due to our large number of patterns.
Contrary to insn-emit insn-opinit cannot be split that easily. It would
probably need a tree-like approach or similar.
I wouldn't see this as a regression in the classical sense as we just have many
more patterns because of the vector extension.
Is increasing the available memory an option in the meantime or does this
urgently require fixing?
