https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- > Am 11.03.2024 um 20:03 schrieb jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org > <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org>: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114304 > > --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Patch on comment #8 breaks all sorts of things. Not so obvious. I will try > reverting the original hunk from pr105473 and then work from there. Just to add, I think rejecting something we accepted before and when this doesn’t fix a rejects-valid shouldn’t be done on branches and given it affects the standard library, when it’s SONAME is not altered as it might affect programs compiled with older libgfortran (maybe there’s the argument for something like a LIBGFORTRAN_STRICT environment to control such if really needed?) > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug.
