https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114475
Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mikael at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #1)
> > I suspect this commit here,
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;
> > h=44c0398e65347def316700911a51ca8b4ec0a411
> > but not totally certain.
>
> The following patch fixes the apparent regression:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/expr.cc b/gcc/fortran/expr.cc
> index 9a042cd7040..68d16a9a378 100644
> --- a/gcc/fortran/expr.cc
> +++ b/gcc/fortran/expr.cc
> @@ -3517,6 +3563,7 @@ check_restricted (gfc_expr *e)
> if (e->error
> || sym->attr.in_common
> || sym->attr.use_assoc
> + || sym->attr.used_in_submodule
> || sym->attr.dummy
> || sym->attr.implied_index
> || sym->attr.flavor == FL_PARAMETER
>
Yes, I was coming to the same fix.
I'm not too sure about it though.
>
> Looks like the commit actually uncovered a latent issue.
>
> Mikael, do you want to follow up?
Yes, this is mine in any case.
