https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96866
--- Comment #3 from Jiu Fu Guo <guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
While, I'm wondering if we could accept this code, and handle it as something
like:
(insn 5 4 6 (set (reg/f:DI 118)
(mem/u/c:DI (unspec:DI [
(symbol_ref/u:DI ("*.LC0") [flags 0x2])
(reg:DI 2 2)
] UNSPEC_TOCREL) [2 S8 A8])) "t.c":8:8 -1
(expr_list:REG_EQUAL (symbol_ref:DI ("x") [flags 0x80] <var_decl
0x200000b00360 x>)
(nil)))
(insn 6 5 0 (parallel [
(asm_operands/v ("#%a0") ("") 0 [
(reg/f:DI 118)
]
[
(asm_input:DI ("X") t.c:9)
]
[] t.c:9)
(clobber (reg:SI 98 ca))
]) "t.c":9:3 -1
(nil))
