https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115097
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> So actually it seems that the reason is ICF plus inlining:
....
>, introducing the extra copy. Why do we use
> tail-calls here instead of aliases? Why do we lack cost modeling here?
> Why do we inline back? It looks like a pointless exercise to me ...
> With -fdisable-ipa-inline we get
>
> _Z5test2O1A:
> .LFB5:
> .cfi_startproc
> jmp _Z5test1R1A
>
> so that's at least reasonable and what's expected I suppose. So one
> could argue the bug is in the inliner and with introducing the extra
> copy (IIRC there's a bug about this), but still.
Which means this is dup of bug 96252
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 96252 ***
