https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115290
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|tree check fail in |[12/13/14/15 Regression]
|c_tree_printer, at |tree check fail in
|c/c-objc-common.cc:330 |c_tree_printer, at
| |c/c-objc-common.cc:330
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed| |2024-05-30
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
Version|unknown |15.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
<source>:4:50: note: use '&\204[0] == &tls13_handshakes[0]' to compare the
addresses
I think it was introduced with r12-4148-g2dda00b734888d which also introduced
the warning. Since the diagnostic looks broken with release checking.
+ inform (location, "use %<&%D[0] %s &%D[0]%> to compare the addresses",
+ op0, op_symbol_code (code), op1);
%D here is expecting a decl but we have an expression.
