https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115749
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target| |X86_64 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- This seems like a tuning issue. In that gcc thinks the shifts and stuff is faster than mulx. What happens if you do -march=native? Does it use mulx?