https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907
cqwrteur <unlvsur at live dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #21 from cqwrteur <unlvsur at live dot com> ---
(In reply to Arsen Arsenović from comment #20)
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #17)
> > Then why? Why does it define _ISOC2X_SOURCE? C++ is not even C.
>
> "it"? presuming you mean glibc, because _GNU_SOURCES enables all features,
> including the C2X specific ones.
>
> note that not enabling those would not fix downgrading being broken.
Then why is it not the case for C++98 or C18?
