https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115907

--- Comment #30 from cqwrteur <unlvsur at live dot com> ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #29)
> (In reply to Arsen Arsenović from comment #28)
> > (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #26)
> > > > The c++ frontend has defined _GNU_Source since at least 2001.
> > > 
> > > You are de facto, breaking abi without any good reason. You break
> > > cross-compiling for linux distribution for even the last year. Glibc 2.34
> > > (which was just 3 years ago) removed -lpthread dependency. I would accept
> > > glibc2.34 as a base. Then what about this __isoc99scanf that behaves
> > > differently under different C and C++ standard. How is this code even
> > > linkable? It easily becomes ODR violations.
> > 
> > It does not become an ODR violation.  Functions behave different in
> > different languages (such as C99 vs. C23 vs. C++11).  This is not unusual.
> > 
> > > https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32471624
> > > 
> > > The problem is that unlike libstdc++, glibc is not upgradable.
> > 
> > This is false.  I upgraded glibc a few days ago.
> > 
> > > Don't make any excuse tbh. If people are not happy with it, fix it. If 
> > > you give a
> > > reason for breaking abi for a good reason i would accept that, but you 
> > > don't
> > > you just break abi for no reason. In this case, it is more like a bug for 
> > > a
> > > C standard feature where C++ standard does not support, at least not yet.
> > 
> > No ABI was broken.
> > 
> > > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #25)
> > > > _GNU_SOURCE issue is recorded as pr 69350 and pr 11196 and maybe 
> > > > others. 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The other issue is not a gcc issue but a build issue with not using a
> > > > sysroot.
> > > Except no matter i try with sysroot i does not really work out. Plus i am
> > > building crossback compiler. It should not even care about sysroot.
> > 
> > Why not?  It has to pull libraries and headers from somewhere (note that I
> > do not know what "crossback" means).
> > 
> > Note that there is desire to not predefine _GNU_SOURCE in C++ modes.  See
> > the PRs Andrew referenced.
> 
> I don't know how you do that. It is impossible to upgrade glibc on any of my
> linux distributions. I tried ubuntu, arch linux. Neither of them allows me
> to upgrade glibc. After setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH, the kernel just panics. I
> guess you are using some sorts of the linux from scratch.

In fact it is so bad even i access a directory that contains libc for cross
compiling. it crashes the system.

[cqwrteur@DESKTOP-9B705LH x86_64-pc-linux-gnu]$ cd lib64
[cqwrteur@DESKTOP-9B705LH lib64]$ ls
Floating point exception (core dumped)
[cqwrteur@DESKTOP-9B705LH lib64]$ pwd
/home/cqwrteur/toolchains/x86_64-w64-mingw32/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib64
[cqwrteur@DESKTOP-9B705LH lib64]$

Reply via email to