https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116199

--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Definitely a latent bug in reload.  Looks like it's been around since the
conversion to SUBREG_BYTE back in 2001!  We're blindly using
subreg_regno_offset on a case that can't be simplified.  We should be checking
simplify_subreg_regno first.

Reply via email to