https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116724
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1) > Perhaps we should try to capture both the untranslated text and the > translated text? SARIF has various abilities for handling translations. Works for me! The use-case I was thinking of, is for the SARIF output to be a nice containment of the non-source-code part of bug-reports: "instead of quoting stderr, use --diagnostics-format=sarif-file and send sourcename.sarif". But, to fulfill that, more is needed, including the gcc arguments. (Maybe that's all.) I don't see that included, right? Sorry for the "creaturization request"!
