[Bug middle-end/116896] codegen for <=> compared to hand-written equivalent

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116896

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Though, that setg %cl without xorl %ecx, %ecx first is unlikely to perform
well, the clearing would be needed.