https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108236
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords| |wrong-code
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I see what the problem is (I think I remember having exactly teh same bug when
I first implemented the non-parallel version of this algo).