https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118025
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|gcc.dg/field-merge-9.c |[15 Regression]
|FAILs |gcc.dg/field-merge-9.c
| |FAILs
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The test is oddly having two variants depending on byte-order, I'd have
expected two tests with the optimization scan guarded by big/little endianess
instead?
