https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99918
Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression] |[12/13/14 Regression]
|suboptimal code for bool |suboptimal code for bool
|bitfield tests |bitfield tests
CC| |law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The main bug (and known regression) has been fixed on the trunk. However the
additional testcase in c#9 has not.
Given c#9 was unaffected by the changes on the trunk and we have no sense if
c#9 is a regression or not, I've extracted that testcase into a new bug
(bz118267) and I'm adjusting the regression markers on this bug.