https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118400
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6) > Maybe use > > m_vec->truncate (0); > return; > > for simplicity? Then I'll have to retest ;) But I agree it is simpler that way.