https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118400

--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
> Maybe use
> 
>    m_vec->truncate (0);
>    return;
> 
> for simplicity?

Then I'll have to retest ;)
But I agree it is simpler that way.

Reply via email to