https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115265
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > > Great, thanks for adding this testcase. Is there any change the fix in > > PR109066 will be applied to older branches, e.g. 13 and 14? Neither PR is a regression and defined assignment is so fundamentally incorrect, where defined assignment of components is concerned, that sticking plaster patches do not warrant a backport. You could try appealing to the gfortran mailing list. If it is OK'd there, I would be happy to backport to 14-branch. For the same reasons, I decided not to add the testcase after all. Best regards Paul
