https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120644
Giuseppe D'Angelo <peppe at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2025-06-13
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Giuseppe D'Angelo <peppe at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hi,
Confirmed. I can easily push the workaround that you mentioned:
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/optional
b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/optional
index 2ae71f11e21..cc7af5bbd7d 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/optional
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/optional
@@ -1815,7 +1815,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
ranges::enable_view<optional<_Tp>> = true;
template<typename _Tp>
- inline constexpr auto
+ inline constexpr range_format
format_kind<optional<_Tp>> = range_format::disabled;
#endif // __cpp_lib_optional_range_support
Which seems to fix the xtreme-header-2_b.C (... to 7, 8 looks like it's failing
in something unrelated).
But this seems to be fixing a symptom, not a cause, as the code is otherwise
completely equivalent? Should I go ahead nonetheless to cleanup these new test
failures?
