https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123186
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Makes me wonder if the bug isn't that we pass a TYPE_DECL rather than
> IDENTIFIER_NODE to build_typename_type. So perhaps:
> --- gcc/cp/parser.cc.jj 2025-12-17 15:21:21.045719368 +0100
> +++ gcc/cp/parser.cc 2025-12-18 11:11:56.074952675 +0100
> @@ -20435,7 +20435,7 @@ cp_parser_template_id (cp_parser *parser
> fullname, arguments);
> TREE_TYPE (templ)
> = build_typename_type (TYPE_CONTEXT (TREE_TYPE (templ)),
> - TYPE_NAME (TREE_TYPE (templ)),
> + TYPE_IDENTIFIER (TREE_TYPE (templ)),
> fullname,
> get_typename_tag (TREE_TYPE (templ)));
> template_id = templ;
> ?
Oops, yes that definitely should be TYPE_IDENTIFIER.
