https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123853
--- Comment #16 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at debian dot org> --- (In reply to Richard Sandiford from comment #15) break; > I don't think that's the right place to fix the problem. Logically, > substituting into a PARALLEL should be equivalent to substituting into each > individual operand (ASM_OPERANDs excepted), whereas this would introduce a > correctness requirement that substitutions only happen on full patterns. > > But unless I missed an announcement that this had changed, the current > assumption is that we can't take LLM-generated patches, so please don't ask > it to try again :) I didn't really suggest to use an LLM-generated patch. I merely wanted to give a hint on how this could potentially be fixed. This particular issue has been blocking glibc builds with GCC 15 for a while now, so it would be great if it could be fixed.
